[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMPIREDB-374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17494619#comment-17494619
 ] 

Rainer Döbele commented on EMPIREDB-374:
----------------------------------------

We are only still using log4j 1.x for our code examples.

The core module and all extensions (i.e. everything that someone would use in 
their own projects) have only a dependency to Slf4J, so any logger can be used.

The examples are using the lo4j DomConfigurator for which there is 
unfortunately no replacement by either Logback or Log4J 2.x. I will have a look 
at reload4j though.

> replace log4jv1 usage - EOL and with multiple security vulnerabilities
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: EMPIREDB-374
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMPIREDB-374
>             Project: Empire-DB
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: PJ Fanning
>            Priority: Major
>
> [https://github.com/apache/empire-db/blob/master/pom.xml] has dependency on 
> log4j 1.2.17
> Options include:
>  * switching to latest log4j v2
>  * switch to logback
>  * switch to reload4j - a fork of log4j v1 but with security fixes



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to