This looks good to me. Sorry to be so remote these days. I've had people visiting and a lot of work travel. I should be back again soon :-)
Ethan On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote: > My suggestion would be to move the following items to 'backlog': > > * ESME-135 Add LDAP to ESME > * ESME-214 Add container-based authentication > * ESME-235 add the profiler plugin by John Resig to profile our jQuery > calls. > * ESME-308 Update times in standard timeline on a regular basis > * ESME-285 Allow turning features on and off through configuration > options > * ESME-228 Error messages for REST API calls - don't make it back to > the client > > @Imitiaz - are far did you get on the Pubsubhubbub implementation? > > * ESME-170 Pubsubhubbub support for Atom & RSS actions > > Thoughts? > > D. > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: >> Agreed - I think we have enough for a release, after a quick look at >> the closed tickets. >> >> I see one blocker currently - I'm still in the middle of ESME-287 and >> the formating of the user page timeline is a mess (though I believe >> that the comet timeline is actually working fine here). I'll be >> honest: I'm not optimistic I'm going to be able to fix this in >> January. It should be a pure CSS/HTML issue, so if someone else wants >> to take a shot at the formatting that would be excellent. Once this is >> fixed we can close ESME-287 and open a separate ticket for comet-izing >> the search timeline, which I'm still not sure is going to be >> realistic. >> >> Any other things that we *must* fix before a release? >> >> Ethan >> >> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Yes, I agree and think we should move at least LDAP and >>> container-based authentication into the backlog for now. >>> Release early and often ;-) >>> >>> /Anne >>> >>> On 11 January 2011 15:07, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> We should probably decide which features are going to be included in >>>> V1.2. We've currently have feature creep and we should probably maybe >>>> a decision what we really want to include in this version. We might >>>> want to move items that haven't been started yet (LDAP, >>>> container-based authentication, etc) into the backlog and focus on >>>> items that have been started and bugs that are present. >>>> >>>> D. >>>> >>> >> >
