On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: > Using it as an authentication mechanism for our API? Yep
>I'd like to do > this but it probably means a fair amount of work. I'd also think we > should consider doing OAuth 2 at this point. Why OAuth ? What are the differences? > I don't think it should > be part of 1.3. It will probably take too long. Agree about it not being in 1.3. Thinking 1.4 D. > > Ethan > > On Saturday, April 9, 2011, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'm been folllowing the OAuth discussion in Lift : >> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/b511bbc1a37d4166/98b1f654763b355a?show_docid=98b1f654763b355a >> >> When things get straightened out and the code is included in their >> code base, we should probably think about using OAuth in ESME. >> >> Don't know whether we want to wait for 2.4 though, since it might be a >> while before it is released. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> D. >> >
