Looking at other items for 1.3: -------------
[ESME-245] <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-245> Change in API2.scala / line 506 enabled <- S.param("enabled").map(toBoolean) ?~ S.?("base_rest_api_err_missing_param", "enable")) ?~ S.?("base_rest_api_err_missing_param", "enable")) is wrong need to default to true if present: "openor true" ---------------------------------- On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: > This is now complete, as people may have noticed. And just in time to make > it into Dick's latest deploy :-) > > So, do we still have any blocking issues or can we try to evaluate what we > see on the latest deploy to figure out if we are ready for release? I think > the following might be blockers: > > ESME-342 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-342> > > Sign On button doesn't work in > IE9<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-342> > ESME-282 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-282> > > When a public message is resent by one user, no other users are able to > resend it <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-282> > > ESME-282 needs to get fixed, but it probably isn't a major issue. ESME-342 > sounds like a bigger problem. Let me take a look at 342 - I once had a similar problem with Chrome but it appears to have since disappeared. I don't have IE9 on my work machine, so I can't try it out until I get home. > > Ethan > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]>wrote: > >> @Ethan - that's fine - no rush. I'm just trying to keep up the momentum. >> >> D. >> >> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi Dick, >> > >> > On ESME-328, we still have a todo around display of message times. This >> is >> > more complicated than I thought, but I do have a strategy now, and I'll >> > address ESME-308 at the same time, I hope. >> > >> > When are we looking to release? I'm on vacation this week without my >> > computer but I should be able to finish this issue next week. If someone >> > else wants to do it this week that would be great as well. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Ethan >> > >> > >> > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> > >> >> I was looking at the looking at 1.3 status this morning and I have a >> >> few questions: >> >> >> >> @Ethan - can we close ESME-328 "Rewrite the comet timeline"? >> >> >> >> @Vladimir is "ESME-332 "There are still some problems with SBT tests" >> >> still valid after the SBT upgrade? >> >> >> >> @Vladimir can we close "ESME-321 Get rid of deprecated methods"? I >> >> wasn't sure how many deprecated methods will still present. >> >> >> >> D. >> >> >> > >> >
