Leo Simons wrote:
> 
> please indicate what you think makes the most sense and why:
> 
> * which of these should be the (maven) artifact id:
> 
> [X] avalon-framework
> 
> * and which of these:
> 
> [X] avalon-logkit
>
I think avalon should be contained in the name of the artifact as
that's exactly what the artifact is and this would map to the
package names etc.

> 
> If you have something sensible to say about (maven) group ids 
> (I prefer to avoid them and have the group as "prefix" in the 
> artifact name), now would be a good time.
> 
In addition, imho we should use "excalibur" as the group id
so the projects are accessible using "excalibur/avalon-framework" etc.

Carsten


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache Excalibur Project -- URL: http://excalibur.apache.org/

Reply via email to