Hi Leo, I think I have to bite the buller then and set +) urn:avalon:partition ==> component.logger +) urn:avalon:name ==> component.idThe definite answer might come up during the integration tests Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl Leo Simons wrote: On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 05:04:12PM +0200, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:Hi folks,looking at +) http://wiki.apache.org/avalon/AvalonStandards +) http://wiki.apache.org/avalon/AvalonContextSurvey there is a mismatch regarding +) urn:avalon:partition ==> component.id or component.logger +) urn:avalon:name ==> component.logger or component.id Is there any definite answer?My answer: no. I would suggest to *not* do an automatic mapping, or when you do, to double check the results and perhaps modify them. Other people might have other answers, which is probably a further indication that there is no "definite" answer :-) I guess that doesn't help you. Sorry :-$ cheers! Leo |
- A question regaring Avalon context mappings from Merlin ... Siegfried Goeschl
- RE: A question regaring Avalon context mappings fro... Stephen McConnell
- Re: A question regaring Avalon context mappings... Siegfried Goeschl
- RE: A question regaring Avalon context mapp... Stephen McConnell
- Re: A question regaring Avalon context ... Siegfried Goeschl
- RE: A question regaring Avalon con... Stephen McConnell
- Re: A question regaring Avalon context mappings fro... Leo Simons
- Re: A question regaring Avalon context mappings... Siegfried Goeschl