On 4/11/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"get a few cocoon developers on the PMC" is slightly off, since we add people to the PMC based on merit. Of course, there are probably quite a few developers out there who have earned sufficient merit to be on the excalibur PMC, and some of them probably also are cocoon developers. The way I see it, the open invitation extended to them a year or two ago is still pretty much open, we just need to do the voting :-).
Agreed. My concern is that, while we have enough active PMC members to get a release out (slowly) I doubt we could get a quorum of the PMC together to do much else.
(on a tangent: excalibur is one example of several mature, stable, and pretty inactive projects at apache. As a foundation, apache has not yet really figured out a 'standard way' on how to deal with projects with dwindling activity, so in the meantime it's up to each project to figure out what to do.)
For any "stable" projects one goal should be to make it easy to still get a release out without dropping the oversight ball. In Excalibur's case, the involves getting those actually doing releases on the PMC. And as for the current release vote, I just have not had time to look at it. I'm very sorry. I'll see what I can do right now... -- jaaron --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
