[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14276859#comment-14276859
]
Srikanth Sundarrajan commented on FALCON-634:
---------------------------------------------
* Just like how we allow falcon server to be configured on either a local-fs or
any other FS, we should allow similar options for the recipes as well.
* CLI can query the server for recipe artifacts, use them in the client process
to build the recipe and then submit them to the server. Other than listing and
providing the artifacts, server shouldn't do anything specific as far as recipe
is concerned.
> Add recipes in Falcon
> ---------------------
>
> Key: FALCON-634
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-634
> Project: Falcon
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.6
> Reporter: Venkatesh Seetharam
> Labels: recipes
>
> Falcon offers many services OOTB and caters to a wide array of use cases.
> However, there has been many asks that does not fit the functionality offered
> by Falcon. I'm proposing that we add recipes to Falcon which is similar to
> recipes in Whirr and other management solutions such as puppet and chef.
> Overview:
> A recipe essentially is a static process template with parameterized workflow
> to realize a specific use case. For example:
> * replicating directories from one HDFS cluster to another (not timed
> partitions)
> * replicating hive metadata (database, table, views, etc.)
> * replicating between HDFS and Hive - either way
> * anonymization of data based on schema
> * data masking
> * etc.
> Proposal:
> Falcon provides a Process abstraction that encapsulates the configuration
> for a user workflow with scheduling controls. All recipes can be modeled
> as a Process with in Falcon which executes the user workflow
> periodically. The process and its associated workflow are parameterized. The
> user will provide a properties file with name value pairs that are
> substituted by falcon before scheduling it.
> This is a client side concept. The server does not know about a recipe but
> only accepts the cooked recipe as a process entity.
> The CLI would look something like this:
> falcon -recipe $recipe_name -properties $properties_file
> Recipes will reside inside addons (contrib) with source code and will have an
> option to package 'em.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)