JB, We are working on Falcon talking to ActiveMQ HA setup too. Our initial hunch is that as long as the right URL (with fail over scheme) is specified in the configuration, startup properties or cluster definition, it should work without any code changes. Plan to run a quick test soon. Will keep you posted.
Regards, Pallavi On Feb 10, 2015 7:51 PM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm working on the ActiveMQ update (to 5.10.1) and improvements on the > broker (configuration flexibility, tuning, etc). > > I plan also to improve the support of some ActiveMQ features, especially: > 1/ master/slave support with kahadb and JDBC locking backend > 2/ network of brokers support to be able to have Falcon instances > producing on one broker which can dispatch the messages (including conduit > subscriptions support) to other brokers where Falcon instances can get the > messages. > > I will send more details and patches very soon. > > Thanks, > Regards > JB > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > -- _____________________________________________________________ The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your system. The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt.
