[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14364895#comment-14364895
 ] 

Suhas Vasu commented on FALCON-1071:
------------------------------------

It is updated

{noformat}
             Date end = EntityUtil.getNextInstanceTime(start, 
EntityUtil.getFrequency(entityObject),
-                    EntityUtil.getTimeZone(entityObject));
+                    EntityUtil.getTimeZone(entityObject), 1);
             AbstractWorkflowEngine wfEngine = getWorkflowEngine();
             return wfEngine.getInstanceParams(entityObject, start, end, 
lifeCycles);
{noformat}

> Feed Listing API default behaviour for start and end not handled properly. 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FALCON-1071
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1071
>             Project: Falcon
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: feed
>    Affects Versions: trunk
>         Environment: QA
>            Reporter: Karishma Gulati
>            Assignee: Suhas Vasu
>         Attachments: FALCON-1071-v2.patch, FALCON-1071.patch
>
>
> The default values of start and end, in case they aren't specified are as 
> follows:
> {code}
> start <optional param> 
>     By default, it is set to (end - (10 * entityFrequency)).
> end <optional param> 
>     Default is set to now.
> {code}
> So, when only start is specified, it still takes the default value of end as 
> now. Therefore, if a start time of say 2012 is specified, the output will be 
> a massive 3 years worth instance information. If just start is specified, we 
> can probably take the default value of end as start + (10*frequency), as is 
> for the vice versa case. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to