-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39711/#review104372
-----------------------------------------------------------



common/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/entity/FeedHelper.java (line 813)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39711/#comment162628>

    Sorry, for multiple comments. I didn't review Lifecycle feature so I didn't 
have the complete picture.
    
    Frequency in the retention stage is not mandatory and if teh frequency is 
not set by user then
    1> If feed frequency < 6 hrs its set to 6 hrs
    2> If its > 6 hrs its set to feed frequency
    
    Shouldn't it fallbaack to current behavior for retenting the data? < 6hrs 
set to 6 hrs and > 6hrs set to 1 day?
    
    This is required for 2 reasons
    1> Current understanding of users is that if feed frequency > 6 hrs , 
retention job will run every day. We shouldn't deviate from this.
    
    2> I also spoke with Venkatesh about why was it set to 1 day. He mentioned 
in case retention fails and reruns fail too we don't want to keep the data till 
it runs next time if feed frequency is used. This can cause SEC retention 
vioalation and also cause memory issues if feed frequency is say one year. If 
job runs every day it catches up for the scenario mentioned above.
    
    Any specific reason to change the old behavior?


- Sowmya Ramesh


On Oct. 28, 2015, 6:04 p.m., Ajay Yadava wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39711/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 28, 2015, 6:04 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Falcon.
> 
> 
> Bugs: FALCON-1560
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1560
> 
> 
> Repository: falcon-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Lifecycle does not allow feed with frequency greater than days(1)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   common/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/entity/FeedHelper.java 5c252a8 
>   common/src/test/java/org/apache/falcon/entity/FeedHelperTest.java 4020d36 
>   
> common/src/test/java/org/apache/falcon/entity/parser/FeedEntityParserTest.java
>  905be68 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39711/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added unit test for the scenarios.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ajay Yadava
> 
>

Reply via email to