[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14991362#comment-14991362
 ] 

Ajay Yadava commented on FALCON-1573:
-------------------------------------

I am actually _very reluctant_ to have many and verbose namespaces, so I like 
"falcon."(the way you have implemented the existing property for scheduler) 
much more instead of "falcon.system" and no namespace for user properties. I 
have seen too many users crib about every extra character that they have to 
type on command line and use alias instead. I also think it is much clearer in 
understanding and implementing only two types of properties. Properties which 
are interpreted and consumed by falcon and everything else. I am also not sure 
of the impact on other systems like oozie with properties like "oozie.*" 

What I am proposing might not be best approach and if you still disagree then I 
am happy to have a detailed and broader discussion (may be a DISCUSS thread) 
and hear thoughts and use cases from everyone on the same but I would really 
like to unblock this JIRA in the meantime. If we decide otherwise we anyhow 
have to fix the existing property and we will fix these new properties along 
with them before next release to avoid any backward incompatibility issues. 

> Supply user-defined properties to Oozie workflows during schedule
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FALCON-1573
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1573
>             Project: Falcon
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: oozie
>    Affects Versions: trunk
>            Reporter: Daniel del Castillo
>            Assignee: Daniel del Castillo
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: trunk
>
>         Attachments: FALCON-1573-v1.patch, FALCON-1573-v2.patch
>
>
> The work in FALCON-1434 added the ability to specify properties for the 
> purpose of enabling scheduler selection. However, this could be more 
> generally useful as a means for users to submit custom properties that will 
> be visible in Oozie workflows.
> This will enable users to reference properties in the entity XML itself and 
> passing these properties down to workflows. For example, a process scheduled 
> with the command:
> {code}
> bin/falcon entity -schedule -type process -name helloFalconProcess 
> -properties custom.property:HEY
> {code}
> can reference the property _custom.property_ in the process XML as
> {code:xml}
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
> <process name="helloFalconProcess" xmlns="uri:falcon:process:0.1">
>   ...
>   <properties>
>     ...
>     <property name="customProperty" value="${coord:conf('custom.property')}"/>
>     ...
>   </properties>
>   ...
> </process>
> {code}
> An Oozie workflow can then easily make use of such property:
> {code:xml}
> <workflow-app xmlns="uri:oozie:workflow:0.4" name="hello-falcon-wf">
>   ...
>     <java>
>       ...
>       <arg>--customValue=${customProperty}</arg>
>       ...
>     </java>
>     ...
> </workflow-app>
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to