[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ajay Yadava updated FALCON-1605:
--------------------------------
    Summary: Instance API is not working as expected in case of Native 
Scheduler   (was: Instance Api's working not as expected in case of Native 
Scheduler )

> Instance API is not working as expected in case of Native Scheduler 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FALCON-1605
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1605
>             Project: Falcon
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: trunk
>            Reporter: pavan kumar kolamuri
>            Assignee: pavan kumar kolamuri
>             Fix For: 0.9
>
>         Attachments: FALCON-1605.patch
>
>
> Generally all instance api's will take start and end time w.r.t to nominal 
> time. But with new Falcon Scheduler start time and end time are considered 
> w.r.t to actual start time and end time of workflow which leads to 
> incompatible change.
> {noformat}
> falcon instance -type process -name ProcessName -status -start 
> 2015-11-16T04:00Z -end 2015-11-16T04:01Z
> should give output of process instance of nominal time 2015-11-16T04:00Z
> o/p : Instances:
> Instance              Cluster         SourceCluster           Status          
> Start           End             Details                                 Log
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 2015-11-16T04:00Z      local-cluster  -       SUCCEEDED       
> 2015-11-16T04:06Z       2015-11-16T04:13Z       -       
> http://localhost:11000/oozie?job=0113052-151104055028899-oozie-oozi-W
> actions:
>  enhance      SUCCEEDED       
> http://localhost:8088/proxy/application_1446613735384_1027046/
> but with new falcon scheduler it is not giving any output since workflow 
> started later at 2015-11-16T04:06Z.
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to