[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15035564#comment-15035564
 ] 

Narayan Periwal commented on FALCON-1598:
-----------------------------------------

We delete the feed concurrently instead of cluster. This will reduce the 
chances of the testcase failing considerably. 

> Flaky test : EntityManagerJerseyIT.testDuplicateDeleteCommands
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FALCON-1598
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1598
>             Project: Falcon
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: tests
>    Affects Versions: 0.8
>            Reporter: Balu Vellanki
>            Assignee: Narayan Periwal
>             Fix For: trunk
>
>         Attachments: FALCON-1598.patch
>
>
> testDuplicateDeleteCommands fails occasionally with following error
> {code}
> Tests run: 28, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 51.226 sec 
> <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.falcon.resource.EntityManagerJerseyIT
> testDuplicateDeleteCommands(org.apache.falcon.resource.EntityManagerJerseyIT) 
>  Time elapsed: 0.643 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<400> but was:<200>
> at org.testng.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89)
> at org.testng.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:489)
> at org.testng.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:118)
> at org.testng.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:365)
> at org.testng.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:375)
> at org.apache.falcon.resource.TestContext.assertFailure(TestContext.java:439)
> at 
> org.apache.falcon.resource.EntityManagerJerseyIT.testDuplicateCommandsResponse(EntityManagerJerseyIT.java:629)
> at 
> org.apache.falcon.resource.EntityManagerJerseyIT.testDuplicateDeleteCommands(EntityManagerJerseyIT.java:622)
> {code}
> Looking at the code, I found that the test expects one of the two delete 
> commands to fail when attempting to delete same cluster. I think the premise 
> of the test is incorrect. If one of the two commands are expected to fail, 
> isnt that breaking Falcon's idempotent behavior?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to