[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14021638#comment-14021638
]
Venkatesh Seetharam commented on FALCON-453:
--------------------------------------------
Thanks [[email protected]] for reviewing this in detail. You are correct, I had
it as AL v2 earlier before but overwrote it with the latest one.
bq. Are you absolutely sure that v3.0.2 is using the MIT license?
bq. AFAICT the above link is for the current version, i.e. 3.1.1, and may not
apply to previous releases.
You are indeed correct. I'll update the Copyright as reflected in the source
and assume this is not necessary in NOTICE file as this is AL v2. Agree?
> possible LICENSE/NOTICE issues
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: FALCON-453
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-453
> Project: Falcon
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 0.5
> Reporter: Venkatesh Seetharam
> Assignee: Venkatesh Seetharam
> Fix For: 0.5
>
> Attachments: FALCON-453.patch
>
>
> What external code has been bundled with the source? To me it look like the
> NOTICE file may be referring to a binary release not the source release? For
> example it mentions antlr in the NOTICE file but I can't find any antlr code
> in the source release. As antlr is BSD does it even need to be in NOTICE
> file? It's may be that all source files have had their headers changed to
> ALv2?
> I also not the use of some fonts (from http://glyphicons.com?) and while they
> are included in the NOTICE but I'm not sure how they have been licensed. If
> it the free version and if so have the terms of the license met? [1]
> NOTICE file is incorrect; it must not have the following header:
> =========================================================================
> == NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d of ==
> == the Apache License, Version 2.0, ==
> == in this case for the Apache Falcon distribution. ==
> =========================================================================
> Also the NOTICE file must ONLY contain required notices for files that
> are actually in the enclosing distribution.
> As such, the entries headed "This product includes/uses" are wrong;
> only *included* bits are relevant when determining what must go in the
> NOTICE file.
> The LICENSE file should specify the versions of the included software,
> because licenses may change between versions.
> Again, only included code should be referenced.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
