unsubscribe Michael I Lazar 301 202 4084
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Chris Douglas (JIRA) <[email protected]> wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > ] > > Chris Douglas updated FALCON-453: > --------------------------------- > > Attachment: FALCON-453-deps.patch > > Attached a proposal for the MIT/3-clause BSD licensing for dagre, d3, and > dust. [~wheat9], please confirm the version numbers. I had to infer some of > them from the commit dates, since FALCON-194 and FALCON-367 were not > specific about the included versions. The license doesn't change in any of > these, but we should be specific in case it does (like bootstrap). > > [~jmclean], could you take a quick look? Once we're certain of the version > numbers, we'd like to roll a new RC. > > > possible LICENSE/NOTICE issues > > ------------------------------ > > > > Key: FALCON-453 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-453 > > Project: Falcon > > Issue Type: Sub-task > > Affects Versions: 0.5 > > Reporter: Venkatesh Seetharam > > Assignee: Venkatesh Seetharam > > Fix For: 0.5 > > > > Attachments: FALCON-453-deps.patch, FALCON-453-v2.patch, > FALCON-453.patch > > > > > > What external code has been bundled with the source? To me it look like > the NOTICE file may be referring to a binary release not the source > release? For example it mentions antlr in the NOTICE file but I can't find > any antlr code in the source release. As antlr is BSD does it even need to > be in NOTICE file? It's may be that all source files have had their > headers changed to ALv2? > > I also not the use of some fonts (from http://glyphicons.com?) and > while they are included in the NOTICE but I'm not sure how they have been > licensed. If it the free version and if so have the terms of the license > met? [1] > > NOTICE file is incorrect; it must not have the following header: > > ========================================================================= > > == NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d of == > > == the Apache License, Version 2.0, == > > == in this case for the Apache Falcon distribution. == > > ========================================================================= > > Also the NOTICE file must ONLY contain required notices for files that > > are actually in the enclosing distribution. > > As such, the entries headed "This product includes/uses" are wrong; > > only *included* bits are relevant when determining what must go in the > > NOTICE file. > > The LICENSE file should specify the versions of the included software, > > because licenses may change between versions. > > Again, only included code should be referenced. > > > > -- > This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA > (v6.2#6252) >
