----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25446/#review52653 -----------------------------------------------------------
falcon-regression/merlin/src/test/java/org/apache/falcon/regression/NoOutputProcessTest.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/25446/#comment91532> Why have we changed the workflow that was being used ? And in case we want to do that then we can get rid of aggregateWorkflowDir field. - Raghav Gautam On Sept. 8, 2014, 9:31 a.m., Paul Isaychuk wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/25446/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 8, 2014, 9:31 a.m.) > > > Review request for Falcon. > > > Bugs: FALCON-693 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-693 > > > Repository: falcon-git > > > Description > ------- > > Tests with zero inp/outp fixed to use correct workflow, javadocs added > > > Diffs > ----- > > > falcon-regression/merlin/src/test/java/org/apache/falcon/regression/NoOutputProcessTest.java > 638768d > > falcon-regression/merlin/src/test/java/org/apache/falcon/regression/prism/PrismFeedUpdateTest.java > 1225525 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25446/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Tested. > > > Thanks, > > Paul Isaychuk > >
