[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14187350#comment-14187350
]
Shaik Idris Ali commented on FALCON-721:
----------------------------------------
{quote}I agree with you that having a slaHigh more than retention limit doesn't
make much sense but this doesn't break anything in the system {quote}
Agree that it does not break anything, but I prefer Falcon warning user during
the configuration phase itself.
If a feed has retention of 6 hours and the SLA is 8 hours.
I assume Falcon or any other service monitoring service will make a call at 8th
hour to check for the feed availability in which case it will always Alert as
retention would have deleted it?
> Add SLA for Feeds
> ------------------
>
> Key: FALCON-721
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-721
> Project: Falcon
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Ajay Yadav
> Assignee: Ajay Yadav
> Attachments: FALCON-721-v2.patch, FALCON-721.patch
>
>
> Add two new xml Tags slaLow and slaHigh for the feeds.
> slaLow is intended to be used as watermark for triggering alert and slaHigh
> is intended to be used as watermark for finding breach of SLA.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
