Marcel Offermans wrote:
On Jul 11, 2007, at 16:45 , Richard S. Hall wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 01:52, Richard S. Hall wrote:
Should we have an sandbox package name space?
Agree.
Well, it looks like we have Niclas and myself as +1 and Marcel as
-1/0...can we come to a consensus about this?
Whilst I don't see much benefit from using the sandbox package
namespace (whenever possible) I would not go so far as to "-1" the
proposal. As far as I'm concerned we can agree to use that namespace.
Karl also says that he isn't against the idea, so I propose that we
enact this convention:
If you are creating something new (i.e., not a branch) in your
sandbox, then you should use the "org.apache.felix.sandbox" package
space.
If we don't hear any objections in a couple of days, then we can
considered this resolved.
-> richard
