Hello, 2007/9/22, Marcel Offermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sep 22, 2007, at 2:54 , Stefano Lenzi wrote: > > > - Should we keep the sandbox word in the package name? I think we > > can rid of it. > > If my memory serves me well, I think we discussed this a while ago > and concluded that all projects in the sandbox should also have the > word sandbox in the package name.
I is the convention for sandbox projects. However, we can remove "sandbox" as the project is no more in the sandbox. > - Why in the repository goal does the plugin look for obr.xml > > file? Which is the difference between obr.xml and repository.xml? > > Probably, there is no difference. At least conceptually, an OBR > compliant repository needs a file describing the (metadata of the) > contents. This file is usually called repository.xml, but probably > that is not a fixed name (correct me if I'm wrong, I did not re-read > the RFC about OBR while replying). There is a difference. The OBR.xml file is a file that each project an contain. This file describes OBR-metadata of the project that are not computed by bindex. As OBR is extensible, we need a file where describing customized capabilities and requirements. Clement Greetings, Marcel > >
