Richard S. Hall wrote: > > In truth, I don't know what the actual rule is here. The library in question > is > Apache licensed code, so certainly there is little harm involved. > Exactly, now it would be nice if we had a complete notice file, but I don't think that this is a hard requirement. From the legal point of view, we have ensured that only libs with an Apache or Apache compatible license are used. In fact, this raises the question to me what we should do with transitive dependencies? For now, we mention only the direct deps in NOTICE and LICENSE (note that this is not tied to the scrplugin; I think the other modules have similar problems).
So far, only Felix has voted with a -1 - Felix do you still think that we should redo the release with the changed NOTICE file as a 1.0.1? Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
