Stuart McCulloch wrote:
On 05/02/2008, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looks good to me.
Up until now we have been including in the notice file our top-level
dependencies. Is there some distinction we want to draw between "used"
software that is actually embedded in the release versus "used" software
that we depend on?
I thought that was covered by the 'Included Software' vs. 'Used Software'
sections.
(ie. embedded software from outside the project comes under 'Included
Software' ?)
Ok, if that is the distinction...I guess I wasn't thinking of it that
way...so, then it looks good to me.
-> richard
-> richard
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
what do you think if we start setting up our notice file like this:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/scrplugin/NOTICE
(I just committed it to have a better base for discussion as quoting
the whole thing in an email is not very comfortable for discussing.)
I splitted the notice file into three sections, one listening the
included software (and licenses), one section for the used software
(and licenses) and the third one for a summary of all licenses.
WDYT?
Carsten
