[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger closed FELIX-516.
-----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Implemented a marker in the Configuration object which defines, whether the
last change of a configuration update or delete has already been delivered to
the owning ManagedService[Factory] or not.
Fixed in Rev. 635540 and deployed new SNAPSHOT version 1.0.1-20080310.123324-2
> ManagedService[Factory] may be updated twice with the same Configuration
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FELIX-516
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-516
> Project: Felix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Configuration Admin
> Affects Versions: configadmin-1.0.0
> Reporter: Felix Meschberger
> Assignee: Felix Meschberger
> Fix For: configadmin-1.0.1
>
>
> The Configuration Admin service implementation has a multi-threading issue in
> that a configuration may be delivered to a ManagedService[Factory] twice
> under certain conditions.
> Consider the situation of thread Threads T1 registering a
> ManagedServiceFactory, T2 creating and updating a configuration object for
> the ManagedServiceFactory registered by T1 and T3 the background thread
> managed by the Configuration Admin Service to serialize configuration updates.
> Thread T1 was registering a ManagedServiceFactory
> In T1 the ConfigurationAdmin service sees the service and schedules
> configuration of it
> Thread T2 was creating and setting a configuration C
> In T2 the ConfigurationAdmin service schedules the update of the
> ManagedServiceFactory
> Thread T3 handles the first scheduled task of initially providing the
> service with configuration
> (created by T1 in the meantime)
> Thread T3 handles the second scheduled task of updating the configuration
> Hence the ManagedServiceFactory is updated twice with the same configuration
> and thus cycles the service.
> The fix is to record in the Configuration object that it was sent to the
> consuming service and to prevent sending the update of a configuration, which
> has already been sent.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.