> I hate to raise some issues with this release since I know it was a pain for > Clement to create and I, as much as anyone, want to get an iPOJO release out > the door; however, we might need address some of these issues: > > Serious issues > -------------- > > * org.apache.felix.ipojo.ant embeds ObjectWeb code, but nothing in > NOTICE and no license. > * org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite embeds ObjectWeb code, but > nothing in NOTICE and no license.
Good catch! I'm not sure how this one should be handled. The issue is that they don't include ObjectWeb source! They artifacts however, embed code from ObjectWeb (bsd) via a transitive dependency. I agree that at least the artifacts should add this to their NOTICE. Whether it is a hard requirement or not I don't know enough about the legal situation but I would argue we should be strict because I think we should give credit where credit is due ... > * org.apache.felix.ipojo.manipulator doesn't include ASM license > (perhaps this is not so serious, since it is mentioned in the > notice file). And the license is bsd - I don't think this is a showstopper. > * org.apache.felix.ipojo.handler.temporal does not include > NOTICE/LICENSE files. Darn. I missed that one. This is a bad. I think we have to fix the issues (i.e., cut a new release) for at least org.apache.felix.ipojo.handler.temporal. Furthermore, I would redo org.apache.felix.ipojo.ant and org.apache.felix.ipojo.composite unless the general opinion is that this is not that bad. Clement, you are the release manager on this one, what is your opinion? regards, Karl > Minor issues > ------------ > > * org.apache.felix.ipojo.handler.extender.pattern says it includes > OSGi software, but it doesn't. > * org.apache.felix.ipojo.handler.white.board.pattern says it > includes OSGi software, but it doesn't. > * Change artifact names for extender and whiteboard handlers; e.g., > change "org.apache.felix.ipojo.handler.extender.pattern" to > "org.apache.felix.ipojo.handler.extender" and > "org.apache.felix.ipojo.handler.white.board.pattern" to > "org.apache.felix.ipojo.handler.whiteboard". > * Eliminate bz2 digest files (I know maven generates these, but just > delete them to avoid the mess). > > > -> richard > > Clement Escoffier wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> I finally cut the first release of the iPOJO framework. >> >> >> Eleven artifacts compose this first release (version 0.8.0): >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~clement/releases/org/apache/felix/org.apache.felix >> .ipojo.metadata/ >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~clement/releases/org/apache/felix/org.apache.felix >> .ipojo.manipulator/ >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~clement/releases/org/apache/felix/org.apache.felix >> .ipojo.ant/ >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~clement/releases/org/apache/felix/maven-ipojo-plug >> in/ >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~clement/releases/org/apache/felix/org.apache.felix >> .ipojo/ >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~clement/releases/org/apache/felix/org.apache.felix >> .ipojo.arch/ >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~clement/releases/org/apache/felix/org.apache.felix >> .ipojo.annotations/ >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~clement/releases/org/apache/felix/org.apache.felix >> .ipojo.handler.extender.pattern/ >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~clement/releases/org/apache/felix/org.apache.felix >> .ipojo.handler.white.board.pattern/ >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~clement/releases/org/apache/felix/org.apache.felix >> .ipojo.handler.temporal/ >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~clement/releases/org/apache/felix/org.apache.felix >> .ipojo.arch/ >> >> >> The KEYS for verifying the signature is also in the directories, the >> >> MD5 and SHA1 files are maven generated. >> >> So please check the releases and cast your votes - the vote will be open >> for >> one week (as there several artifacts): >> >> >> [ ] +1 release all >> >> [ ] 0 don't care >> >> [ ] -1 do NOT release, because .... >> >> >> Thanks and Regards >> >> >> Clement >> >> >> > -- Karl Pauls [EMAIL PROTECTED]
