Felix:

I have checked against the HEAD on svn, and it seems to me as if it works properly.

If I may, I would suggest a small improvement to the visualization:

At the moment it is very difficult to realize which instance one is editing. I would suggest to: 1. retain the selection (marking the corresponding Configuration option as selected); and maybe 2. clearly separate the selectors and show the configuration information before the form.

Thanks and keep up the good work :)

Regards,
Dieter



On 17 Jun 2008, at 06:57, Felix Meschberger wrote:

Hi Dieter,

I continued on improving configuration support in the web console today
and deployed a new SNAPSHOT version 1.0.1-20080617.115310-3.

Could you please verify, that it works as you expect it work with
respect to your issues:

FELIX-583 org .apache .felix .webconsole.internal.compendium.ConfigManager.listConfigurations(): ManagedServiceFactory instances are listed twice: with pid and factoryPid FELIX-584 org .apache .felix .webconsole .internal.compendium.AjaxConfigManagerAction.applyConfiguration(): "create" action is not handled properly FELIX-585 org .apache .felix .webconsole.internal.compendium.ConfigManager.listConfigurations(): Configuration instances for ManagedServiceFactoy instances cause IllegalArgumentException FELIX-586 org .apache .felix .webconsole .internal.compendium.BaseConfigManager.getAttributeDefinitionMap(): implementation does not properly handle Configuration instances of a ManagedServiceFactory FELIX-587 org .apache .felix .webconsole .internal.compendium.AjaxConfigManagerAction.configForm(): Configuration instance for a ManagedServiceFactory will cause Exception

Thanks alot.

Regards
Felix


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to