Felix:I have checked against the HEAD on svn, and it seems to me as if it works properly.
If I may, I would suggest a small improvement to the visualization:At the moment it is very difficult to realize which instance one is editing. I would suggest to: 1. retain the selection (marking the corresponding Configuration option as selected); and maybe 2. clearly separate the selectors and show the configuration information before the form.
Thanks and keep up the good work :) Regards, Dieter On 17 Jun 2008, at 06:57, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi Dieter,I continued on improving configuration support in the web console todayand deployed a new SNAPSHOT version 1.0.1-20080617.115310-3. Could you please verify, that it works as you expect it work with respect to your issues:FELIX-583 org .apache .felix .webconsole.internal.compendium.ConfigManager.listConfigurations(): ManagedServiceFactory instances are listed twice: with pid and factoryPid FELIX-584 org .apache .felix .webconsole .internal.compendium.AjaxConfigManagerAction.applyConfiguration(): "create" action is not handled properly FELIX-585 org .apache .felix .webconsole.internal.compendium.ConfigManager.listConfigurations(): Configuration instances for ManagedServiceFactoy instances cause IllegalArgumentException FELIX-586 org .apache .felix .webconsole .internal.compendium.BaseConfigManager.getAttributeDefinitionMap(): implementation does not properly handle Configuration instances of a ManagedServiceFactory FELIX-587 org .apache .felix .webconsole .internal.compendium.AjaxConfigManagerAction.configForm(): Configuration instance for a ManagedServiceFactory will cause ExceptionThanks alot. Regards Felix
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
