Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Monday 28 July 2008 14:33, Marcel Offermans wrote: > >> I'd prefer a name that reflects the main features of this logger. Something >> like plugable logger, or log adapter. >> > > Main feature; Interception of calls to many/most existing Log framework in > legacy code that is OSGi-enabled without being OSGi dependent.
So, something like: log.legacyinterceptor log.interceptor > Suggestions; > log.flogger (I love that name...) If we explain what it does, I'm okay with this too. :) Greetings, Marcel
