I think that 1.2 is a good version as this should signal to people that there are new features added, where 1.0.5 to me sounds like a bug fixing release. But why is not 1.1? Because it follows the odd number for development / even number for release?
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 3:09 AM, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I propose that we call the next Felix release 1.2, since it will be the > first release to include some sort of support for fragments. The goal will > be to have this release come out around the end of August or beginning of > September, but the sooner the better. > > Along with partial fragment support, I think we should be able to target the > following outstanding issues for inclusion in the release: > > * FELIX-102 - A patch submitted by Alin to support singleton bundles. > * FELIX-650 - A related patch submitted by Alin for parsing the > bundle symbolic name header parameters. > * FELIX-577 - A patch submitted by Guillaume to improve bundle: URL > handling. > * FELIX-582 - Modify Felix URLs to return better "last modified" > information. > > These all seem do-able. I think we could also consider this one, since I > have it working in my workspace: > > * FELIX-595 - Update Felix to use OSGi R4.1 API. > > Thoughts on all of this? > > -> richard > -- Alin Dreghiciu http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software. http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. http://malaysia.jayway.net - New Energy for Projects - Great People working on Great Projects at Great Places
