[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12641395#action_12641395
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-784:
---------------------------------------
Sounds reasonable to me. I would just get rid of the old names, no reason to
keep them around.
> Create "felix" property name as alternatives to old style Oscar property names
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FELIX-784
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-784
> Project: Felix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: HTTP Service
> Reporter: Rob Walker
> Priority: Trivial
>
> Some of the Http properties still use the old Oscar prefix.
> The following set is proposed for the old and new equivalent names:
> org.ungoverned.osgi.bundle.https.enable ----->
> org.apache.felix.https.enable
> org.ungoverned.osgi.bundle.https.provider ----->
> org.apache.felix.https.provider
> org.ungoverned.osgi.bundle.https.keystore ----->
> org.apache.felix.https.keystore
> org.ungoverned.osgi.bundle.https.password ----->
> org.apache.felix.https.password
> org.ungoverned.osgi.bundle.https.key.password ----->
> org.apache.felix.https.key.password
> org.apache.felix.http.jetty.debug -----> org.apache.felix.http.debug
> Whilst the latter already has a "felix" name, if Felix adds a later
> lightweight/non-jetty it will make for simpler migration to have a non-jetty
> specific property name
> For backwards compatibility it is probably best to create newer "felix"
> alternatives in parallel to the older style name, so either name may be used.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
