2008/11/6 Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Yep, Clement is correct. > > We have introduced a new property in 1.3.0 development version (1.4.0 > should be officially released soon). These new changes align with a standard > framework API under consideration by the OSGi Alliance. > > Felix will now set a reasonable default value for > org.osgi.framework.system.packages, but you can override the default by > setting this property yourself. If you just want to append to the default > value, then use org.osgi.framework.system.packages.extra, like Clement > described. >
quick question: has "felix.startlevel.framework" been deprecated in favour of "org.osgi.framework.startlevel" ? if so then should the old property name still be checked as a last resort? I think it's currently ignored in trunk, but "felix.startlevel.bundle" still seems to be accepted... -> richard > > Clement Escoffier wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> You can set the "org.osgi.framework.system.packages.extra=" property in >> the >> conf.properties file. >> For example: >> org.osgi.framework.system.packages.extra=foo;version=1.0.0, \ >> bar;version=1.1.0 >> >> Those packages will be appended to the default list contained in Felix. >> So, if you launch the 'packages 0' command in the Felix shell, you will >> see >> the default exported packages, and the two appended packages: >> ->packages 0 >> ... >> System Bundle (0): org.xml.sax.ext; version=1.5.0 >> System Bundle (0): org.xml.sax.helpers; version=1.5.0 >> System Bundle (0): foo; version=1.0.0 >> System Bundle (0): bar; version=1.1.0 >> >> Regards, >> >> >> Clement >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Atle Prange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mercredi 5 >> novembre 2008 08:20 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Felix 1.3.0 Changes >> >> Hei, >> >> i have just built the 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT and i see there are some changes from >> the 1.2.1 (obviously). >> >> I have a question about how i declare the packages the framework should >> export. Are they defined as before, or is there a new key in the >> config.proprties? >> >> Thank you >> - atle prange >> >> >> > -- Cheers, Stuart
