[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12659047#action_12659047
]
Tatu Saloranta commented on FELIX-833:
--------------------------------------
Hi Dieter! Apologies for slow response -- I don't seem to get follow-ups via
email. Anyway: I think service like you created makes sense. I actually ended
up doing something similar, regarding extended Stax2 api
(http://woodstox.codehaus.org/3.9.9-2/javadoc/index.html; package
org.codehaus.stax2.osgi).
So I agree that such a service makes sense.
I think the main challenge is just to get all stax implementations (or at least
Woodstox, Sun sjsxp, and perhaps Stax ref. impl) to implement it. If that can
be done it'd be neat. I would definitely want to help by making sure Woodstox
implements it.
I can try joining Felix dev list, hopefully it's not too high traffic for me to
follow. :-)
> Woodstox xml processor bundle inclusion?
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: FELIX-833
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-833
> Project: Felix
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Bundle Repository (OBR)
> Reporter: Tatu Saloranta
> Priority: Minor
>
> Apologies for a vague entry: but I am hoping this is an ok way to introduce
> the thing.
> So: version 4.0.0 of Woodstox xml processor (http://woodstox.codehaus.org)
> has OSGi-enabled versions of its deliverables (jars). These are built using
> Ant and bnd task. This is done for the core Woodstox jar as well as
> supporting pieces.
> After doing this, it was suggested that I should check out if others might be
> interested in using these artifacts, whatever the method might be (i.e.
> getting copies of jars or something).
> Right now Woodstox project does publish these jars via Maven repos, even
> though build process is not done using Maven; they should be visible via
> Codehaus maven repo and replicated to other usual open Maven repositories.
> Anyway, I don't know if there is any work involved. I am excited about adding
> OSGi support, and am hoping it might make using Woodstox even easier.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
