2009/1/30 Marcel Offermans <marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl> > Procecurally, should I cut a 2.0.1 release candidate now, or can I just add > those missing packages (which I just did not copy to my home directory, but > I already have them)? >
personally I'm ok with continuing the vote once they've been uploaded (as it's already been tagged and I can cross-check the sources, etc.) but I don't know the official procedure... Greetings, Marcel > > > On Jan 30, 2009, at 16:01 , Felix Meschberger wrote: > > Hi, >> >> -1 (on procedural ground) >> >> Since Apache is about open source, all releases are primarily source >> releases. And it is in fact the source release, which is to be voted >> upon. The binary packages are just convenience (though I admit that >> these days, I only care marginally for the source releases, generally). >> >> Regards >> Felix >> >> Marcel Offermans schrieb: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> This is the first release candidate for the dependency manager and its >>> optional shell command bundle. I've compiled everything and put it up >>> for testing and checking here: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~marrs/dependencymanager-2.0.0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emarrs/dependencymanager-2.0.0/> >>> >>> The KEYS file for verifying the signature is also in this directory and >>> the checksum files should have the correct format. >>> >>> The main reason for naming this release 2.0.0 is that there have been >>> many 1.x versions and snapshots out there, so to avoid any confusion I'm >>> starting with 2.0.0. >>> >>> Please check the release and cast your votes, the vote will be open for >>> at least 72 hours: >>> >>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) >>> >>> Greetings, Marcel >>> >>> >>> > -- Cheers, Stuart
