[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12679745#action_12679745
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-905:
---------------------------------------
David, I applied the patch. I made some minor modifications and one major
modification. The major modification dealt with getting the hooks. The patch
creates a new array each time there is a request for any hook. I modified it to
return a collection backed by an array instead. Although, now I think I might
have been over zealous, since I don't think my approach saves anything and
could actually be worse.
Perhaps we can change it back to your original approach later or think of a
better approach that doesn't require that we create new object instances,
unless something has changed. Oh well. An "A" for effort. ;-)
We will keep these issues open, since the functionality isn't complete yet.
> Felix needs an RFC 126 FindHook
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: FELIX-905
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-905
> Project: Felix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Framework, Specification compliance
> Reporter: David Bosschaert
> Attachments: rfc126_eventhook_findhook.patch
>
>
> RFC 126 defines a FindHook that Felix needs to implement.
> For more information see:
> http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft2.pdf
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
