On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Alin Dreghiciu <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for moving SMX Kernel to Felix and also for the name. I'm just > wondering about the following: SMXK comes with its one, very > nice/powerful shell: gshell and quote a lot of effort is there to > implement OSGi and services related shell commands. Very good guys. > But now there is another shell at felix which again has its own > commands. More Peter Kriens donated his own shell implementation which > was used to prototype RFC132. So, isn't there to many shells? I think > from the user perspective will be good if they are familiar with the > shell regardless they use Felix or SMK shell. More, writing commands > shall not be a duplicate effort, something for felix shell and > something for SMXK. > Personally I would like a combination between gshell and PeterK work.
I agree, it would make sense to look into providing one shell eventually. Or at least a way to reuse commands between the different implementations, however, I think this can be a long term goal. regards, Karl > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: >> During ApacheCon last week, there has been some discussions around >> moving ServiceMix Kernel as a subproject of Felix. >> ServiceMix Kernel is a packaged distribution of Felix designed for >> server side applications (see http://servicemix.apache.org/kernel/ for >> more informations). >> >> I think this would be beneficial for this project as it would enable >> to build a much bigger community around it, increase the visibility >> and the awareness around it. Of course, it would need a new name, but >> that's another problem. >> Another area that could be included in this move is the ServiceMix >> specs (OSGi enhanced versions of Java EE specifications from Geronimo) >> and ServiceMix bundles (we've released a bunch of bundles already, see >> http://servicemix.apache.org/smx4/bundles-repository.html). >> >> I'd like to have feedback from both communities (and any other >> interested parties) to gauge the interest in such a move. >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> ------------------------ >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> ------------------------ >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com >> > > > > -- > Alin Dreghiciu > http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open > Participation Software. > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. > Looking for a job. > Sent from Cluj-Napoca, CJ, Romania > -- Karl Pauls [email protected]
