Stuart McCulloch schrieb: > 2009/4/18 Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> > >> Hi, >> >> Clement Escoffier schrieb: >>> Hi, >>> On 18.04.2009, at 11:41, Felix Meschberger wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Stuart, >>>> >>>> Stuart McCulloch schrieb: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to stage a new release of our parent pom (ie. pom/pom.xml) - >>>>> this >>>>> will exercise the new release process. >>>>> Are there any objections to starting this? Does anyone have any >>>>> changes they >>>>> would like to make to this pom? >>>>> >>>>> Note that this isn't a vote on the actual release - I will start that >>>>> once >>>>> I've staged it using Nexus. >>>>> >>>>> Also please hold off from any new releases until I've tried out the new >>>>> process and documented it on the wiki :) >>>> Can we split the parent pom (definitions pertaining to all Felix >>>> projects) and reactor (<modules> section) functionalities into into two >>>> files by that matter ? >>>> >>>> We could for example create a reactor project at trunk, which stays at >>>> SNAPSHOT version for ever and which we can update as we see fit to >>>> accomodate new child projects. >>>> >>>> The actual parent pom would remain where it was and would be updated and >>>> released for release new general setup such as the deployment >>>> configuration. >>>> >>>> In addition it is IMO also a matter of separation of concerns (reactor >>>> vs. general setup). We have done this in the Sling and Jackrabbit >>>> projects with much success (IMHO). >>> I agree having two files: >>> - one with the reactor configuration and >>> - one with the release / project configuration >>> sounds good. >>> >>> Projects should inherit of the release / project configuration pom file. >>> >>> However, aren't we already in this mode ? Recently, I saw a pom file in >>> the Felix root (the reactor one ?) and one in the pom folder. >> I was confused by this file, too. >> >> But the actual reactor is in the pom/pom.xml file. >> > > That's not quite right - Carsten created a top-level pom with a copy of the > reactor and left > the old modules definition in the parent pom. Argh, that was an oversight then :( Sorry, I forgot to commit my local copy of the parent pom :(
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [email protected]
