Hi, Richard S. Hall schrieb: > On 05/15/2009 09:04 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: >> >> Agreed. But then setting the Reply-To address to dev@ seems to be >> incorrect, too: replies may come in and there is no initial mail and >> thus researching archives would also be incomplete. >> > > Well, I think we are adept enough on this list to figure it out. :-) > > Seriously, I don't know what the best reply-to address would be. Since > we are sending this out for users, it seems like reply-to should be set > to users@ since if anyone has issues using it, it should be sent to > there. I doubt the replies would be about developing the internals > (i.e., dev@ subjects). What do you think?
Good. Im in ;-) Regards Felix > > -> richard > >> Regards >> Felix >> >> >>> -> richard >>> >>> On 05/15/2009 01:35 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> In the Nexus release management documentation [1] it notes, to >>>> "Remember >>>> to forward this announcement to [email protected] - try not to >>>> cross-post (CC:) announcements to both user and dev lists". >>>> >>>> How about changing this to sending the announcement to announce(at)a.o, >>>> dev@ and users@ and setting Reply-To to dev@ ? >>>> >>>> This would simplify the announcement sending and I think that in this >>>> case cross-posting is not a big issue. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Felix >>>> >>>> [1] http://felix.apache.org/site/release-management-nexus.html >>>> >>>> >
