On 15.05.2009, at 18:13, Richard S. Hall wrote:

On 5/15/09 11:51 AM, Clement Escoffier wrote:
Hi,

I have a couple of issue to discuss before voting:
- Source artifacts are missing

Aren't these source artifacts?

   
http://people.apache.org/~lenzi/releases/org.apache.felix.upnp.extra-0.4.0/org.apache.felix.upnp.extra-0.4.0-sources.jar
   
http://people.apache.org/~lenzi/releases/org.apache.felix.upnp.tester-0.4.0/org.apache.felix.upnp.tester-0.4.0-sources.jar

Oups, miss them. I need to sleep more especially before checking a release.



- The release doesn't use Nexus (but Stuart has provided a script to turn around that for a former release of the framework)

Are those issue blocking issue ?

Don't know. We should probably delete the old release document to avoid confusion.

I agree. I think that Stuart has a script to promote the release to nexus directly. So, it should not block the release, but the release process is a little bit more complex.
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--VOTE--Felix-1.6.1-framework-and-main-subproject-releases-p23260370.html

Regards,


Clement





On the release itself, nothing major :
- Copyright year are not correct (should contain 2009)
- The OSGi copyright years are not correct. It should be (2000, 2007). - Your tester project notice should says that it "uses" code developed at the ASF (you import org.apache.felix.upnp.basedriver....)

Yep.

-> richard

Regards,

Clement

On 14.05.2009, at 22:52, Richard S. Hall wrote:

+1

Minor issues:

 * Copyright years should mention 2009 in NOTICE files.
 * Tester pom file says it depends on basedriver, so this dependency
   should be mentioned in the NOTICE file under "uses" on Apache
   software for completeness.

-> richard


On 5/14/09 11:39 AM, Stefano Lenzi wrote:
I would like to call a vote for the release of two UPnP project:
- UPnP Extra 0.4.0
- UPnP Tester 0.4.0

The source and binary release archives, signature files, SHA and MD5
message digests for each are available as zip and tar.gz here:

http://people.apache.org/~lenzi/releases

Please vote to approve these release archives:

[ ] +1 Approve the releases
[ ] -1 Veto the releases (please provide specific comments)

Ciao,
Stefano "Kismet" Lenzi


Reply via email to