I agree with the above, this makes sense to have in Karaf.

Jamie

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Edell Nolan<[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 It was would really good to have it in Karaf
>
> Edell.
>
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Yes, I think we should definitely move the plugin inside Karaf.
>>
>> On 06/06/2009, Gert Vanthienen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Robert,
>> >
>> > That plugin does not have any ServiceMix-specific functions -- it was
>> > built to work with the ServiceMix Kernel features XML files so it
>> > would make a lot of sense to move that into Karaf.  Given that we
>> > already have issues raised in Felix JIRA for this plugin, I think this
>> > has probably been the plan from the beginning, although this has not
>> > been explicitly communicated anywhere.  Just created
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1200 to track that task.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Gert Vanthienen
>> > ------------------------
>> > Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
>> > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2009/6/6 Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]>:
>> >> the servicemix maven features plugin looks like it might be really
>> >> useful for Karaf
>> >>
>> >> 1. is it possible to separate the servicemix specific functions?
>> >> 2. are there any plans to move, fork or split the plugin into karaf?
>> >>
>> >> - robert
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>

Reply via email to