>> I've got my handler working properly now, but I'm unhappy that I need to add 
>> the -Djava.protocol.handler.pkgs=my.pkg.prefix property to my application 
>> container's startup configuration.  Ideally I could update the system 
>> property in some startup code and have one less thing to make sure is 
>> configured.  This works when I run my application in a "standalone" mode 
>> where my application starts up Jetty and manually registers its servlets, 
>> and it seems to work without the jvm-option in glassfish 2.1.1 (pre felix, I 
>> believe).
>>   
> 
> I am not sure I understand. The "-D" option is used to define a system 
> property...thus this is already looked up via a system property in the Felix 
> framework. I think this is how Java defines it to work, since 
> "java.protocol.handler.pkgs" is defined by the JRE, not us.
> 
> So, you should be able to set this property in your startup code. It is 
> initialized in a static block, however, so you should set the system property 
> before trying to do anything with any framework classes, since the property 
> is only read once.
> 

I believe the static block will run before any code of mine will ever run, 
though, because the framework is loaded up by the application container.

--Royce



> -> richard
> 
>> I appreciate that this change may cause the handler for a particular 
>> protocol to be unstable depending upon when the system property is set, and 
>> that's a compelling reason to not do this, but I felt it'd be worth 
>> discussing.  I'm certainly no expert in your domain, so please feel free to 
>> get the hell off your mailing list ;)
>> 
>> I guess I'm reeling from how much configuration I'm finding I need to do as 
>> I move to Java EE... perhaps I just need to harden up ;)
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> --Royce
>> 
>> On 11/11/2009, at 2:09 AM, Royce Ausburn wrote:
>> 
>>   
>>> Just wanted to confirm I'm a fool and it's all working beautifully.  Sorry 
>>> for the false alarm =)
>>> 
>>> --Royce
>>> 
>>> On 10/11/2009, at 8:43 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>>> 
>>>     
>>>> Yes, we do fallback to the java.protocol.handler.pkgs system property.
>>>> Let us know if you run into any difficulties with that as it would be
>>>> a bug if that doesn't work :-)
>>>> 
>>>> regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Karl
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Royce Ausburn<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>       
>>>>> Hi again,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I've been doing a little more reading of the code and I think I was 
>>>>> mistaken.  Looks like the lookup is done properly in 
>>>>> URLHandlers.getBuiltInStreamHandler().
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sorry - must have got a wire crossed.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --Royce
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 10/11/2009, at 2:13 PM, Royce Ausburn wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>         
>>>>>> G'day all,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm porting a legacy application to Java EE and having trouble running 
>>>>>> my app under glassfish v3 prelude.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The problem is URL stream handlers.  My application used to register a 
>>>>>> URLStreamHandlerFactory against java.net.URL, but that doesn't work 
>>>>>> anymore as felix registers a factory before my app starts.  So I decided 
>>>>>> to use the java.protocol.handler.pkgs system property only to find that 
>>>>>> it's not effective.  After checking out Felix from svn I found the 
>>>>>> URLHandlers class honours handlers for some default protocols (file, 
>>>>>> ftp, http, https, jar), but it seems that any other protocols are 
>>>>>> discarded.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm not familiar with osgi... Is it intended behaviour to ignore the 
>>>>>> rest?  If so, I'm interested to know why.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I suppose I have the option to write a bundle and register that, but I'm 
>>>>>> not keen on it... The application's handlers use classes from the 
>>>>>> application and working out how this would work in a bundle isn't 
>>>>>> something I'd like to spend my time on as I have deadlines to meet =(
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Is there any way I can get around this?  Would it be possible to have 
>>>>>> the URLHandler class fall back to the system properties if no bundle has 
>>>>>> been registered?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --Royce
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>           
>>>>> 
>>>>>         
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Karl Pauls
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>>       
>>>     
>>   
> 

Reply via email to