On 1/20/10 14:58, Chris Custine wrote:
FELIX-1929 fixes an issue with fileinstall (FELIX-1928 fixed fileinstall,
but only on Equinox until FELIX-1929 makes it into a release) and that is
the main fix we need for Karaf. That has already been committed on trunk.
Good, so it will be included.
The rest of the commits on trunk since 2.0.2 all look worthy as well, though
I haven't had time to review FELIX-1991. Is that something you were
considering for a 2.0.x release?
Yes, that will be included, but it is a containerism which I essentially
consider private API and would not recommend anyone use.
I agree that FELIX-1919 would be very nice to have. I'll dig into that one
a bit and see if I can help at all.
I pretty much have a plan for that, but if you want to take a stab at
it, feel free. I will likely get to it sometime this week, so you will
have to be quick. :-)
-> richard
Chris
--
Chris Custine
FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com
My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com
Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org
Apache Felix :: http://felix.apache.org
Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Richard S. Hall<[email protected]>wrote:
On 1/20/10 11:13, Chris Custine wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like to do a bugfix release of Karaf (probably 1.2.1) and include some
recent framework fixes. Does anyone have imminent plans for a framework
2.1.0 release? If this isn't happening any time soon, would anyone object
if I created a framework 2.0.3 release with some of the recent bugfixes?
A 2.2.0 release (or potentially 3.0) is a little ways off. We are planning
a 2.0.3 soonish. At this point, it is pretty close, but I wanted to find the
time to look into FELIX-1919 for inclusion.
Which bug fixes do you need?
-> richard
Thanks,
Chris
--
Chris Custine
FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com
My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com
Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org
Apache Felix :: http://felix.apache.org
Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
