[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eoghan Glynn updated FELIX-2049:
--------------------------------
Attachment: felix_2249_2.patch
Just noticed a linger println() in the initial patch, please use this one
instead.
> extend org.apache.felix.karaf.testing.Helper to emit a karaf-specific
> execution environment file for pax-runner
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FELIX-2049
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2049
> Project: Felix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Karaf
> Affects Versions: karaf-1.4.0
> Reporter: Eoghan Glynn
> Fix For: karaf-1.4.0
>
> Attachments: felix_2249.patch, felix_2249_2.patch
>
>
> I've been looking into rebasing an existing test on the new
> org.apache.felix.karaf.testing.Helper class, but I don't think it goes quite
> far enough in imposing the karaf runtime environment on pax-runner.
> Specifically, just pulling in the config.properties settings related to the
> system.packages doesn't stop pax-runner generating a system packages list
> with its own notion of what packages are appropriate for the current JRE
> version.
> So for Java6 we end up with problematic entries like javax.xml.ws*,
> javax.activation etc. which cause trouble for any bundles doing
> version-constrained imports of these packages (because equinox assigns "0.0"
> as the version for system packages).
> What's needed, I think, is for the Helper to generate a pax-runner execution
> environment file, named say
> target/paxrunner/platform/ee/karaf/jre-1.{5|6}.profile, and containing the
> correct set of system packages for karaf (i.e. the
> org.osgi.framework.system.packages property read from the config.properties
> with the jre-1.{5|6} variable substituted in). The Helper should also set
> rawPaxRunnerOption("--ee",
> "file://./target/paxrunner/platform/ee/karaf/jre-1.{5|6}.profile") as one of
> the default options.
> Feedback welcome if I'm on the wrong track with this. But if there are no
> objections, I'll go ahead and code this up & then submit a patch.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.