+1 signatures and all work for me. On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 07:03, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote: > +1 > > I had an issue with using the checked_staged_release.sh script...it reported > the signatures as bad. However, when I calculated them manually, they > matched. So, I am not completely sure what is going on there. > > The distribution looks better than before, but it still includes pom.xml and > assembly.xml...can't we just exclude these altogether, since they are > confusing and unnecessary. > > Also, the NOTICE file for the distribution is titled "Apache Felix Main", > but it should probably be "Apache Felix Main Distribution" or something like > that. > > Otherwise, it looks good and it's nice to get these fixes out right away so > we can start focusing on the next major release. > > Thanks, Karl! > > -> richard > > On 2/15/10 8:22 AM, Karl Pauls wrote: >> >> I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases: >> >> framework 2.0.4 >> main 2.0.4 >> main.distribution 2.0.4 >> >> Staging repository: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-003/ >> >> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the >> signatures: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh >> >> Usage: >> sh check_staged_release.sh 003 /tmp/felix-staging >> >> Please vote to approve this release: >> >> [ ] +1 Approve the release >> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) >> >
-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
