Sounds good. On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:34, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Hmm, yes, right .... > > On 16.02.2010 17:32, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> I may be wrong, but I'd say that using the same symbolic name for two >> different bundles is kinda a bad idea. >> What's the reason behind that ? > > Not enough thinking ;-) > > I created FELIX-2086 to ensure this gets fixed in the next release. > > How about: > > * org.apache.felix.webconsole for the full variant > * org.apache.felix.webconsole.bare for the bare variant > > WDYT ? > > Regards > Felix > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2086 > >> >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 16:06, Sahoo <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I have two questions: >>> 1. Should the two variants [1] of web console use the same symbolic name and >>> version? >>> 2. The felix release repo [2] contains bare variant of the webconsole. Could >>> it contain both the variants? Is the answer NO because they use same >>> symbolic name and version. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sahoo >>> >>> [1] >>> http://felix.apache.org/site/apache-felix-web-console.html#ApacheFelixWebConsole-Variants >>> [2] http://felix.apache.org/obr/releases.xml >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> >> >
-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
