Clement Escoffier wrote: > Hi, > > I've looked into this release, and I've a couple of comments: > - first the NOTICE file does not follow the format generally used for Felix > projects which means that automatic or semi-automatic checking tools failed. > - then, the embedded EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent package should also be > cited in the license. The work 'partially' comes from Sun which means that > some parts was made directly at oswego. It would be nice to cite them under > the same license term. > - despite it's obvious the 'Licensed under the Apache License 2.0.' is > missing for the software developed at the ASF. > > I'm not sure these issues are blocking the release, but it would be useful to > fix them in the next versions. > I don't consider these blockers - we discussed the oswego stuff and the notice file with the attempt to do the 1.2.0 release; we withdrew it and thought that the new notice file would be good :)
But you're right that we should update the notice file for the future. Carsten > Regards, > > Clement > > >> On 18.02.2010 09:08, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We solved 6 issues in this release: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX/fixforversion/12314393 >>> >>> Staging repository: >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-008/ >>> >>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the >>> signatures: >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh >>> >>> Usage: >>> sh check_staged_release.sh 008 /tmp/felix-staging >>> >>> Please vote to approve this release: >>> >>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) >>> >>> This vote will be open for 72 hours. >>> >>> Carsten > > -- Carsten Ziegeler [email protected]
