ok, thanks for the information. /pierre
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Peter Kriens <[email protected]> wrote: > Such a proposal is not in the planning ... but it is likely that this will > pop up after we have the easy configuration model in place. > > Kind regards, > > Peter Kriens > > > On 4 jan 2011, at 12:27, Pierre De Rop wrote: > > > Peter, > > > > Just out of curiosity: I have another question regarding > DeclarativeService > > and the new upcoming ConfigAdmin: > > > > Currently, if I am correct, a DS component can retrieve its configuration > > from its PID (PID == the component name). Now, with the new ConfigAdmin > > draft (even if it is released later), will DS spec be also updated in > order > > to allow some DS components to get their configurations not only from > their > > own PID, but also from other shared PIDs (like public system > configurations, > > global or group properties, etc ...) ? > > > > /pierre > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Peter Kriens <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Be very careful, the last EG meeting made some drastic decisions about > the > >> COnfig Admin changes. It seems likely we will have a version 2 CM spec > >> because some people regarded the changes as not backward compatible. It > is > >> very unlikely that this will become part of the upcoming release for > Eclipse > >> Con but it will likely become part of the later releases this year. > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> > >> Peter Kriens > >> > >> > >> > >> On 4 jan 2011, at 04:37, Felix Meschberger wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Am Montag, den 03.01.2011, 23:52 +0100 schrieb Pierre De Rop: > >>>> Hello everyone (and happy new year to all the Felix community !) > >>>> > >>>> I see that the new Coordinator Service from the OSGI 4.3 draft > >> specification > >>>> is already > >>>> implemented in the Felix trunk. So, does this mean that the > >> Configuration > >>>> Admin changes proposed > >>>> in the 4.3 draft will also be implemented soon ? > >>> > >>> Yes. > >>> > >>> In addition, I am planning to implement the simple Configuration > >>> specification. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> Felix > >>> > >>>> > >>>> I am actually very interested in the new CM draft, because it seems > that > >>>> now, PIDS are not bound anymore > >>>> to a single location bundle, which allows to share some global PIDs > >> between > >>>> several bundles, like > >>>> "system" configurations, global properties, etc ... > >>>> > >>>> Thanks; > >>>> /pierre > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
