Fair enough. I'll start a vote now. On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 09:39, Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org> wrote: > Guillaume Nodet wrote >> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 02:52, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote: >>> >>> If enough people respond maybe we can reach some sort of consensus...or else >>> we could call a vote on it. >> >> Can other felix members speak here ? >> > I guess we don't find consensus by just discussing :) Some of us prefer > it this way, others the other way. I prefer increasing the version > number for each retry, it requires no additional work (except changing > the version in jira) and makes it easier to track if people are using > failed releases. Sure, comparing the hash of the binary artifact would > solve this as well, but just looking at the version number is soo easy :) > > If - as a project - we agree to use the same version number for retries > I'm ok with as well. > > But I agree we should do this consistently and just write it down > somewhere. So let's call a vote and the majority wins :) > > Carsten > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > cziege...@apache.org >
-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
