Hi, Just to shed some light from other projects:
* In Jackrabbit a tag was created in anticipation of an imminent release 2.2.3. A bug was discovered. The tag was removed and the next release will be 2.2.4 (there will not be a 2.2.3). * In Tomcat they voted on a release and found issues (quality wise) so decided to declare 7.0.7 broken. The version number was not reused and the release currently under vote has the next version 7.0.8. Regards Felix Am Montag, den 07.02.2011, 10:56 +0000 schrieb Jeremy Hughes: > A (non-binding). > > FWIW: Stuart brought me off the fence. If the first 1.0.x release is > 1.0.5 then under semantic versioning guidelines this would mean 5 > releases of the bundle at previous micro numbers have already passed > which might cause users some confusion, or cause them to ask for an > explanation. This confusion persists for ever more. The number of > people seeing this admittedly lesser kind of confusion will likely be > far greater than the people who use the RC artifacts from a staging > repo, who should know better. > > On 5 February 2011 12:50, Stuart McCulloch <mccu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 5 February 2011 12:21, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> As long has the release has not been approved, the tag does not match > >> an official release, so it can be freely deleted. > >> > > > > yep, that's what I meant - another point to consider is users might see > > 1.0.5 and think it's stable (as it's not 1.0.0) whereas in fact there could > > have been 5 staged versions just to sort out license / dependency issues and > > no actual code changes > > > > Once the release is voted, I think everyone agree the tag becomes immutable. > >> > >> FWIW, Git is much better as a tag really correspond to a moment in the > >> history, not a branch (which actually makes more sense if you think > >> about it). > > > > > > agreed, git is better in this regard - but it can be hard to understand at > > times :) > > > > > >> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 11:04, Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@adobe.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Am Samstag, den 05.02.2011, 09:52 +0000 schrieb Sahoo: > >> >> On Friday 04 February 2011 04:48 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > >> >> > it is easy to retag releases in svn > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> What exactly do you mean by "retag releases in svn?" Rename an existing > >> >> tag or using the same tag name to tag a different snapshot of the source > >> >> code base? Neither should be done in my IMHO. > >> > > >> > Agreed, both is far too easy ... > >> > > >> > Regards > >> > Felix > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Cheers, > >> Guillaume Nodet > >> ------------------------ > >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > >> ------------------------ > >> Open Source SOA > >> http://fusesource.com > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Cheers, Stuart > >
