[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13050573#comment-13050573
 ] 

Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-3000:
------------------------------------------

@Callbacks: Yes. BTW Just a nitpick, but I think the call to 
"((ServiceRegistrationImpl) reg).invalidate();" in the 
unregisterService(Bundle, ServiceReference) method needs not be in the 
synchronized(this) block.

@4.0: Ok, thanks for the info. Lets pick this up again, when we need to ;-)

> Move sending service registered event out of bundle lock
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-3000
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3000
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Framework
>    Affects Versions: framework-3.0.7, framework-3.2.2
>            Reporter: Felix Meschberger
>             Fix For: framework-4.0.0
>
>         Attachments: FELIX-3000-stacktrace.txt, FELIX-3000.patch
>
>
> We have a strange situation on a Framework 3.0.7 based system here which is 
> not reproducible on all platforms.
> We can track down a system freeze/deadlock to three threads all contending 
> for bundle locks and the global lock. See attached FELIX-3000-stacktrace.txt 
> for the stack trace.
> Looking at the Framework source, particularly acquireBundleLock and 
> acquireGlobalLock I cannot see where this "deadlock" can occur.
> The only hint I have is a note in the Felix.registerService:
> > // TODO: CONCURRENCY - Reconsider firing event here, outside of the
> > // bundle lock.
> I wonder whether this situation can be fixed with moving the service 
> registration event ?
> Looking at the code it seems to have not been changed. Thus I report this 
> against 3.0.7 where we saw this and 3.2.2 being the latest release.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to