[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13092666#comment-13092666
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-3089:
------------------------------------------
Agreed. I think this is this piece of code verifying dependencies:
if ( !dm.hasGetPermission() ) {
// bundle has no service get permission
** satisfied = false;
} else if ( !dm.isSatisfied() ) {
// bundle would have permission but there are not enough
services
satisfied = false;
}
At ** we should probably assume satisfaction if the reference is optional.
> A component without ServicePermissions cannot be registered as a service
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FELIX-3089
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3089
> Project: Felix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Declarative Services (SCR)
> Affects Versions: scr-1.6.0
> Reporter: Yasuhiro Kawame
>
> Given the following Component XML
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <scr:component immediate="true"
> xmlns:scr="http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/scr/v1.1.0";>
> <implementation class="BindingImpl" />
> <reference
> bind="bind"
> unbind="unbind"
> policy="dynamic"
> cardinality="0..1"
> interface="ServiceProvider"
> />
> <service>
> <provide interface="Binding" />
> </service>
> </scr:component>
> When this component's bundle does not have ServicePermission[ServiceProvider
> , GET], Binding is not registered as a service.
> But I think that Binding can be registered.
> Because the component's reference specifies optional cardinality.
> (see OSGi Compendium R4.2
> 112.3.2 Reference Cardinality, 112.9.1 Service Permissions)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
