Hi,

Being late here ...

Yes, I very much welcome this.

As for Scala: As long as it is compiled into Java Byte Code, I am fine.
Plus this would finally be something real (and closer to what I do
everyday) to get into that.

And yes, the syntax reminds me of my APL lectures, too ;-)

Regards
Felix


On 23.09.2011 18:27, Arjun Panday wrote:
> Hi Marcel,
>
> Thanks a lot for your feedback.
>
> I agree with you that the interface should be improved.. maybe using 
> different shapes for bundles, components and dependencies. For now it's 
> essentially the arrow pointing to what's missing.
>
> As for Scala; I originally wrote a Java implementation of this, but it's 
> over 3 times longer and therefore not necessarily easier to figure out. 
> Scala does take a little bit of getting used to, but in my experience, 
> especially when it comes to filtering lists and maps, i find that 
> functional programming really is the way to go.
>
> Regards,
> Arjun
>
>
> On 09/23/2011 03:56 PM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
>> Hello Arjun,
>>
>> On Sep 22, 2011, at 10:42 PM, Arjun Panday (JIRA) wrote:
>>
>>> A Service Diagnostics service and graphical WebConsole plugin
>> I very much like the idea of doing diagnostics about (service) dependencies 
>> over bundles and across "dependency management" frameworks, hunting for root 
>> causes of why things don't come up. I briefly played with your 
>> implementation and the graphical plugin for WebConsole.
>>
>> To be honest, I did not find the graphical representation immediately 
>> obvious. for example, it's hard to distinguish between components and 
>> services, to see if something is a required dependency or not, etc. However, 
>> with a bit of extra work, I think that can easily be improved.
>>
>> About the implementation, I'm not the biggest fan of Scala. I can read it if 
>> I really apply myself, but if I had to maintain this code, I would rewrite 
>> it in Java.
>>
>> That being said, I think this is something very useful and I would like to 
>> adopt it (and I'm especially interested in what my fellow committers, 
>> especially the ones maintaining Declarative Services and iPOJO, think about 
>> this).
>>
>> Thanks for sharing this with us!
>>
>> Greetings, Marcel
>>
>

Reply via email to