[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13125083#comment-13125083
]
Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3154:
----------------------------------------
Still, once you detect it, you can then use the Felix framework constructor.
There isn't much else that makes sense. We could create some new
FelixFrameworkFactory, but how is that any better than just using the framework
constructor directly?
Although Felix' system bundle activators are a little more convenient, there is
nothing they provide that can't be mimicked with the standard API, I don't
believe. So, there isn't much reason to use them.
> "felix.systembundle.activators" list : there is a change in config map form
> felix v3 to felix v4
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FELIX-3154
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3154
> Project: Felix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Framework
> Affects Versions: framework-4.0.0
> Reporter: Andrei Pozolotin
>
> there is a change in config map form felix v3 to felix v4
> Map<String, Object>
> http://www.osgi.org/javadoc/r4v42/org/osgi/framework/launch/FrameworkFactory.html
> Map<String, String>
> http://www.osgi.org/javadoc/r4v43/org/osgi/framework/launch/FrameworkFactory.html
> short of raw type hack in; what is the correct way to provide
> "felix.systembundle.activators" list ?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
